Improving the Rate of Same-Day Discharge in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery-An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Quality Improvement Initiative.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of our quality improvement (QI) initiative were (1) to increase the rate of same-day discharge (SDD) in eligible gynecologic oncology (GO) patients to 70% and (2) to evaluate the ease with which QI methods demonstrated in one study could be applied at another center. DESIGN: A pre-/postintervention design was used (50 patients/group). SETTING: SDD in patients undergoing minimally invasive GO surgery is a recent trend aligned with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) principles. SDD in GO is safe and feasible based on several recent studies, including a QI initiative in Edmonton, Alberta, which resulted in SDD rates >70%. PATIENTS: A baseline audit of GO patients at our center (Calgary, Alberta) found the SDD rate to be 14%. Given that Edmonton and our center are within the same province, they have similar patient populations and available resources-suggesting that interventions from the Edmonton QI initiative may be translatable. INTERVENTIONS: Four interventions were designed to address root causes for failed SDD identified after QI diagnostics: (1) SDD as the default discharge plan, including a "Day Surgery" surgical booking; (2 and 3) development and implementation of ERAS SDD preoperative and postoperative order sets; and (4) patient education SDD-specific documents. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Rate of SDD was measured together with patient demographics and surgical outcomes. Process and balancing measures were defined and tracked. SDD in GO increased from 14% (7 of 50) to 82% (41 of 50) after the implementation of the above-mentioned interventions (odds ratio [OR], 28; p <.001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.54-82.11). Improved SDD was achieved without negatively affecting postoperative rates of emergency department visits: 8% pre- and 4% postintervention within 7 days (OR, 0.48; p = .678; 95% CI, 0.09-2.74) and 12% pre- and 10% postintervention within 30 days (OR, 0.8148; p = 1.001; 95% CI, 0.2317-2.86). CONCLUSION: This ERAS QI initiative resulted in a substantial increase in SDD in GO, without a negative impact on balancing measures. We demonstrate that the "spread" of simple, clearly defined QI interventions across centers (where the patient population is similar) is feasible. This suggests that an ERAS SDD program for GO could be a realistic goal for other centers with similar characteristics.

Improving the Rate of Same-day Discharge in Gynecologic Oncology Patients with Endometrial Cancer undergoing Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

STUDY OBJECTIVE/SETTING/PATIENTS: Same-day discharge (SDD) in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is safe and feasible, with multiple patient and healthcare system benefits. Despite this, our local rate of SDD was only 29.4%. Several studies have suggested methods to improve rates of SDD but few have evaluated the application of such methods. The objectives of our quality improvement (QI) initiative were 2-fold: (1) to increase the rate of SDD in eligible patients with endometrial cancer undergoing MIS to 70% and (2) to evaluate the implementation of methods to improve rates of SDD. DESIGN/INTERVENTIONS/MEASUREMENTS: At our center, QI diagnostics were conducted, and root causes were identified. Four interventions were introduced: (1) setting SDD as the default discharge plan, (2) ensuring that a physician order for discharge was on the chart, (3) removing the Foley catheter in the operating room, and (4) introducing pre- and postoperative patient education documents. A time-series design was used; rate of SDD was tracked using baseline data and continuous post-intervention monitoring. Process measures (for each intervention) and balancing measures were defined and tracked. MAIN RESULTS: At the conclusion of our QI initiative, the average rate of SDD was 78.3%-exceeding our aim of 70%. This was achieved without compromising patient satisfaction (98.2%) or significantly impacting rates of readmission or presentations to the emergency department. CONCLUSIONS: Our initiative demonstrated the application of simple interventions that resulted in a substantial increase in our rate of SDD in the population of interest, without causing negative impacts on the defined balancing measures. These interventions were nonspecific to gynecologic oncology and could easily be applied across other surgical disciplines.

The Impact of Gynaecological Tumour Board Rounds on Patient Care.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the impact of tumour board rounds (TBRs) on the additional management of patients with gynaecologic malignancy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 1604 patients discussed between January 2011 and December 2013 at gynaecologic TBRs was conducted to determine the frequency and type of diagnostic discrepancies found post-TBRs and their potential impact on additional patient management. A discrepancy was defined as major if it affected patient management by cancelling, initiating, or modifying treatment; otherwise, the discrepancy was minor. Data collected included patients' demographics, pre- and post-TBR diagnoses, and management. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 57.6 ± 14.1. Endometrial disease accounted for (43%) of the TBRs. The remaining sites were ovarian (25%), cervical (23%), and others (9%). Overall, 13.2% (n = 212) had a discrepancy; 3.4% (n = 54) of these discrepancies were major, and 9.9% (n = 158) were minor. Most major discrepancies related to changes in the tumours' primary site or stage, and most minor discrepancies were related to changes in tumour histotype. Among the 54 (25.5%) major discrepancies, 18 (33.3%) occurred in patients who had their additional management cancelled, 17 (31.5%) required chemotherapy, 4 (7.4%) required a change in the chemotherapy regimen, 10 (18.5%) required additional surgery, and 5 (9.3%) required chemoradiation. CONCLUSION: The 13% frequency of discrepancies, approximately 26% of which were major and resulted in changes in patient management, highlights the importance of TBRs as a quality tool.

A homolog of Subtilisin-like Proprotein Convertase 7 is essential to anterior neural development in Xenopus.

BACKGROUND: Subtilisin-like Proprotein Convertase 7 (SPC7) is a member of the subtilisin/kexin family of pro-protein convertases. It cleaves many pro-proteins to release their active proteins, including members of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) family of signaling molecules. Other SPCs are known to be required during embryonic development but corresponding data regarding SPC7 have not been reported previously. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We demonstrated that Xenopus SPC7 (SPC7) was expressed predominantly in the developing brain and eye, throughout the neural plate initially, then more specifically in the lens and retina primordia as development progressed. Since no prior functional information has been reported for SPC7, we used gain- and loss-of-function experiments to investigate the possibility that it may also convey patterning or tissue specification information similarly to Furin, SPC4, and SPC6. Overexpression of SPC7 was without effect. In contrast, injection of SPC7 antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (MO) into a single blastomere at the 2- or 4-cell stage produced marked disruption of head structures; anophthalmia was salient. Bilateral injections suppressed head and eye formation completely. In parallel with suppression of eye and brain development by SPC7 knockdown, expression of early anterior neural markers (Sox2, Otx2, Rx2, and Pax6) and late eye-specific markers (ß-Crystallin and Opsin), and of BMP target genes such as Tbx2 and Tbx3, was reduced or eliminated. Taken together, these findings suggest a critical role for SPC7-perhaps, at least in part, due to activation of one or more BMPs-in early patterning of the anterior neural plate and its derivatives. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: SPC7 is required for normal development of the eye and brain, possibly through processing BMPs, though other potential substrates cannot be excluded.